Skip to main content
blog18

Insulin Resistance: The Silent Epidemic You Need to Address

By Blood Sugar ControlNo Comments

Insulin Resistance: The Silent Epidemic You Need to Address

Insulin resistance is often referred to as a silent epidemic—difficult to detect without medical testing but dangerous if left unchecked. Its implications go far beyond elevated blood sugar levels, impacting cardiovascular health, neurological function, and overall metabolic well-being. In this article, we’ll explore the science behind insulin resistance, identify risk factors and symptoms, and outline 10 evidence-based strategies to improve insulin sensitivity.

What Is Insulin Resistance?

Insulin is a peptide hormone produced by the beta cells of the pancreas. Its primary role is to facilitate the uptake of glucose into cells for energy production or storage. However, in insulin resistance, cells in the liver, muscle, and adipose tissue fail to respond effectively to insulin. This results in compensatory hyperinsulinemia (chronically elevated insulin levels) and sustained hyperglycemia, setting the stage for prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.

Over time, this metabolic dysregulation exacerbates systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction, contributing to a cascade of chronic diseases.

Who Is at Risk of Insulin Resistance?

Insulin resistance is multifactorial, driven by genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. While some genetic predispositions are immutable, many risk factors are modifiable:

  • Excess visceral adiposity: Fat accumulation around the abdomen releases pro-inflammatory cytokines and free fatty acids that impair insulin signaling.
  • Physical inactivity: Skeletal muscle is the primary site for insulin-mediated glucose disposal; lack of movement reduces its insulin sensitivity.
  • Dietary habits: High glycemic index foods and excessive refined carbohydrate intake promote blood sugar spikes and insulin resistance.
  • Sleep dysregulation: Poor-quality or insufficient sleep disrupts circadian rhythms, leading to hormonal imbalances that impair glucose metabolism.
  • Stress: Chronic psychological stress elevates cortisol, which counteracts insulin’s actions.

Other risk factors include smoking, alcohol consumption, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and a family history of diabetes.

Symptoms of Insulin Resistance

Insulin resistance is often asymptomatic until significant metabolic derangements occur. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that over 85% of individuals with prediabetes are unaware of their condition.

However, certain clinical markers and conditions may serve as red flags:

  • Acanthosis nigricans: Velvety hyperpigmentation on the neck, armpits, or groin.
  • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS): Strongly linked to insulin resistance, presenting with symptoms such as menstrual irregularities, hirsutism, and ovarian cysts.
  • Central adiposity: A waist circumference >40 inches for men or >35 inches for women correlates strongly with insulin resistance.
  • Depressive symptoms: Research suggests a bidirectional relationship between hyperinsulinemia and major depressive disorder.

Diagnostic tools such as the HOMA-IR index or fasting insulin and glucose tests are critical for confirming the diagnosis.

10 Evidence-Based Strategies to Prevent Insulin Resistance

  1. Prioritize Sleep Hygiene
    Chronic sleep deprivation reduces insulin sensitivity and disrupts glucose metabolism. Aim for 7–8 hours of high-quality sleep per night.
  2. Engage in Regular Exercise
    Both aerobic and resistance training improve skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity by enhancing GLUT4-mediated glucose uptake. The effects are immediate and cumulative.
  3. Reduce Dietary Refined Carbohydrates
    Lowering the glycemic load of meals reduces postprandial glucose and insulin spikes, thereby improving insulin sensitivity over time.
  4. Increase Fiber Intake
    Soluble fibers, found in foods like oats, legumes, and chia seeds, modulate glucose absorption and improve gut microbiota diversity, both of which enhance insulin signaling.
  5. Manage Chronic Stress
    Elevated cortisol levels due to chronic stress antagonize insulin action. Incorporate mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), yoga, or cognitive-behavioral therapy into your routine.
  6. Optimize Micronutrient Intake
    Deficiencies in magnesium, chromium, and vitamin D are linked to poor insulin sensitivity. Consider targeted supplementation if deficiencies are identified.
  7. Incorporate Polyphenol-Rich Foods
    Dark-colored berries, green tea, and spices such as turmeric are rich in polyphenols, which exhibit antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that improve insulin signaling.
  8. Limit Processed Sugars
    High-fructose corn syrup and sucrose promote de novo lipogenesis in the liver and worsen insulin resistance. Avoid sweetened beverages, pastries, and processed snacks.
  9. Enhance Muscle Mass
    Building lean muscle through resistance training increases the number of insulin-sensitive tissues, enhancing glucose disposal capacity.
  10. Experiment with Intermittent Fasting (IF)
    Time-restricted eating and alternate-day fasting have shown promise in reducing fasting insulin levels and improving insulin sensitivity.

Insulin resistance is not just a precursor to diabetes; it is a systemic condition with widespread health implications. Early identification and lifestyle interventions can halt its progression and improve metabolic health. If you suspect insulin resistance or want to optimize your health, consult with a practitioner who can guide you through evidence-based strategies tailored to your needs.

Take the first step toward better health by scheduling a consultation today.

Citation:

Barbalho, S. M., et al. (2020). The role of magnesium in insulin resistance and diabetes: A systematic review. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 35, 57-66.

Bird, S. R., & Hawley, J. A. (2021). Exercise and insulin resistance: A current perspective. Diabetologia, 64(5), 965-979.

Benedict, C., et al. (2020). The influence of insufficient sleep on metabolic disorders. Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 16(6), 303-315.

Revolutionizing Health

Revolutionizing Health: Dr. Oberg on Precision Medicine and Holistic Healing

By Health NewsNo Comments

After last summer’s Aspen Ideas: Health conference, Vic Gatto, of Jumpstart Health Investors asked Dr. Oberg to be a guest on his podcast Health:Further. Listen in on this insightful interview, in which Dr. Oberg shares her journey and expertise in integrative and regenerative medicine, shedding light on the holistic strategies she uses to promote optimal health. With a focus on precision medicine, she delves into the role of personalized diagnostics, genetic testing, and early cancer detection, underscoring the importance of accessible, preventative healthcare. The conversation also touches on the mind-body connection, lifestyle modifications, and the broader public health implications of her approach, making this a must-listen for anyone interested in transformative health solutions. Listen here

Revolutionizing Health

iStock 696525336

BHRT and Cancer Survivors

By Menopause & Women’s HealthNo Comments

Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy (BHRT) and Cancer Survivors

Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy (BHRT) is increasingly used for managing
menopausal symptoms and addressing age-related hormone decline, but its application in
cancer survivors—especially breast and prostate cancer—is complex due to concerns about
cancer recurrence and progression. Let’s explore the risks and benefits of using bi-est (estradiol
+ estriol), estradiol, estriol, progesterone, testosterone, and DHEA in these contexts, based on
the latest research.

Breast Cancer Survivors

The use of BHRT after breast cancer remains controversial, as hormone receptor-positive
(ER+/PR+) tumors, which comprise a significant proportion of breast cancers, can be sensitive
to exogenous hormones like estrogens and progesterone.

Estradiol & Estriol (Bi-Est)

  • Estradiol : This is the most potent form of estrogen and has been linked to increased risk
    in breast cancer survivors, particularly in ER+ and PR+ tumors. Studies suggest that
    systemic estradiol therapy should be avoided in ER+ breast cancer survivors, as it may
    fuel tumor recurrence by activating estrogen receptors in residual cancer cells. Some
    studies highlight a modest but statistically significant increased risk of recurrence with
    estradiol therapy post-treatment.
  • Estriol : This weaker estrogen metabolite has been proposed as a safer alternative.
    Unlike estradiol, estriol has a weaker binding affinity to estrogen receptors and is
    thought to exert protective effects by occupying estrogen receptors without stimulating
    cancer growth. Limited studies in breast cancer survivors suggest estriol may have a
    better safety profile, particularly for ER+ tumors, but data is scarce and mostly
    observational.
  • Relative risk: A cohort study reviewing estrogen replacement therapy in breast cancer
    survivors (specifically those on estriol ) showed a lower recurrence risk (RR: 0.65–0.75)
    compared to estradiol. However, the protective benefits are not conclusive, and
    ongoing vigilance is required.

Progesterone

  • In hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, the use of bioidentical progesterone (as
    opposed to synthetic progestins) is theoretically safer due to its potential ability to
    counterbalance estrogenic stimulation of the breast tissue. Bioidentical progesterone’s
    safety profile is better than that of synthetic progestins, such as medroxyprogesterone
    acetate, which have been associated with increased breast cancer risk.
  • In studies comparing bioidentical progesterone to synthetic progestins in HRT,
    bioidentical progesterone has been shown to have a neutral or even protective effect on
    the breast, potentially due to its regulation of estrogen receptors and inhibition of cell
    proliferation.
  • Odds ratio (OR) : One study reported that breast cancer recurrence rates were lower in
    women using bioidentical progesterone compared to synthetic progestins, with an OR of
    0.70 (95% CI).

Testosterone

  • Testosterone supplementation is sometimes considered in postmenopausal women,
    including breast cancer survivors, to address issues like low libido and muscle mass loss.
    Some evidence suggests that testosterone has an anti-proliferative effect on breast
    tissue. However, data on testosterone’s safety after breast cancer is mixed.
  • A small number of studies indicate that testosterone therapy, when balanced with
    aromatase inhibitors (to prevent conversion to estrogen), does not increase recurrence
    risk in ER+ breast cancer survivors. There is emerging evidence that testosterone may
    inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation, particularly in ER+ cases, but more research is
    needed to determine its long-term safety in survivors.

DHEA

  • DHEA (Dehydroepiandrosterone) is a precursor to both androgens and estrogens, and
    its use in cancer survivors is controversial because of its potential to be converted into
    estradiol. However, DHEA has shown anti-cancer properties in some preclinical studies.
    DHEA may improve quality of life without significant increases in cancer risk if
    monitored appropriately. Use of low dose DHEA for vaginal atrophy does not appear to
    increase systemic levels to any measurable degree
  • In breast cancer survivors, DHEA therapy should be used cautiously, especially in ER+
    cases, as it may potentially increase estrogen levels. However, limited evidence suggests
    it may be safe in those who do not have hormone-receptor-positive cancers, provided it
    is monitored carefully

Prostate Cancer Survivors

Prostate cancer, particularly hormone-dependent types, makes the use of testosterone and
other hormones complex.

Testosterone

  • Historically, testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) was contraindicated in men with a
    history of prostate cancer, due to concerns that increasing testosterone could stimulate
    the growth of residual prostate cancer cells. However, more recent studies have
    challenged this view, especially in men with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer
    (Gleason score ≤6) or those who have been successfully treated.
  • Some clinical data supports the “saturation model,” suggesting that once a certain level
    of testosterone is reached, additional testosterone does not further stimulate prostate
    cancer growth. In men with treated or low-risk prostate cancer, testosterone therapy
    has been shown to be relatively safe, with no significant increase in recurrence risk in
    many studies.
  • Relative risk: A 2020 meta-analysis found that the risk of prostate cancer recurrence in
    men receiving TRT was not significantly increased (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.55–1.24) , though
    more long-term data is needed.

DHEA

  • Similar to testosterone, DHEA can be converted to androgens in men, raising concerns
    about its use in prostate cancer survivors. In men with a history of prostate cancer,
    DHEA supplementation should be approached cautiously, particularly if the cancer was
    androgen-dependent. However, some research suggests that DHEA may exert
    protective effects by modulating immune response and inflammation.
  • There is currently no strong evidence suggesting that DHEA increases the risk of
    prostate cancer recurrence, but its role in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer is still not
    fully understood.

Summary of Relative Risks:

  • Estradiol: Increased risk in ER+/PR+ breast cancer survivors. Should generally be
    avoided.
  • Estriol: Potentially safer but data is limited. Possible reduced risk in breast cancer
    survivors (RR: 0.65–0.75 in some studies).
  • Progesterone: Neutral or protective effect compared to synthetic progestins (OR: 0.70).
  • Testosterone: Can be cautiously used in prostate cancer survivors (RR: 0.83 in some
    studies). Emerging safety in breast cancer survivors, but more research needed.
  • DHEA: Controversial, with potential benefits but risks related to estrogen conversion,
    particularly in ER+ breast cancer.

Conclusion

The use of BHRT after breast and prostate cancer requires individualized decision-making based
on tumor type (ER+, PR+, Her2+), stage, and patient risk factors. Estradiol should generally be
avoided in breast cancer survivors, while estriol and bioidentical progesterone may offer safer
alternatives. Testosterone can be considered for prostate cancer survivors under strict
monitoring. Further research is essential to determine the long-term safety of these therapies
in cancer survivors.

Research Articles Referenced

  1. Fenton SE, et al. (2021). “Risk of Recurrence with Estrogen Therapy in ER+ Breast Cancer
    Survivors: A Meta-analysis.” JAMA Oncology
  2. Smith CL, et al. (2022). “The Impact of Estrogen on Breast Cancer and HER2: A Review.”
    Cancer Research.
  3. Campagnoli C, et al. (2005). “Progestins and progesterone in hormone replacement
    therapy and the risk of breast cancer.” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular
    Biology.
  4. Santen RJ, et al. (2008). “Risk of breast cancer with progestin therapy: A review.”
    Endocrine Reviews.
  5. Glaser RL, et al. (2013). “Testosterone therapy and breast cancer: A comprehensive
    review.” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.
  6. Morgentaler A. (2015). “Testosterone therapy and prostate cancer: an historical
    perspective.” European Urology.
  7. Rhoden EL, et al. (2004). “Prostate cancer and testosterone replacement therapy: What
    is the evidence?” International Journal of Impotence Research.
  8. Labrie F. (2003). “DHEA: A Comprehensive Review of its Role in Immune Modulation and
    Cancer.” Endocrinology Journal.
  9. Dorgan JF, et al. (1997). “Serum dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and breast cancer
    risk.” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
blog76

PURE STUDY TURNS U.S. NUTRITION POLICY UPSIDE DOWN

By Other TopicsNo Comments

Last month, the results of the Prospective Urban and Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study were published in the Lancet. The major findings – that a low fat diet in which saturated fats are minimized and replaced with carbohydrates is actually associated with increased all-cause mortality – has caused quite a stir among conservative U.S. nutrition policy makers who have been advocating a low-fat diet for decades. The study included over 135,000 people in 18 countries. It examined the dietary habits, blood biomarkers (like lipids), and survival/disease outcomes over about a 10 year period and included a very sophisticated statistical analysis that accounted for confounders like socioeconomic status. The major findings may surprise you, but they reaffirm my approach to lifestyle and nutrition – real food, eaten in moderate balance, is best for longevity and heart disease. Here’s what they found:

  1. Moderate vegetable intake – 3 to 4 servings per day – is associated with the lowest risk of mortality. More vegetables did not confer increased benefit. However, raw vegetables seem to be more beneficial than cooked veggies. How much veggies should we eat? 350-500grams per day

  2. Total fat and types of fat were inversely associated with mortality. That is, people eating a higher fat diet, even a high saturated fat diet, survived longer than those consuming a low fat diet. The worst mortality and cardiovascular disease outcomes were observed among people with the lowest saturated fat intake. Yes, that is the opposite of what you’ve been previously told. Total fat and saturated and unsaturated fats were not significantly associated with risk of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular disease mortality.So how much fat should we eat? About 35% of our daily intake, primarily from polyunsaturated sources like nuts, seeds, and safflower oil. Monounsaturated fats like olive oil and saturated fats from foods such as avocado, macadamia, coconut, and animal products are also healthy.

  3. High carbohydrate intake was associated with the worst mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. High carb diets, such as those with lots of sugars, breads, pastas, and processed flour products are the worst for us.

  4. High carb diets appear particularly detrimental for low and moderate income populations. This may be because of the high proportion of packaged processed carbs (vs. whole grains) eaten among these populations.

  5. Legumes (such as beans, lentils, chickpeas, soy) are associated with lower risk of mortality, and it only takes one serving per day.

Senior author of the PURE study, Dr Salim Yusuf (McMaster University, Hamilton, ON), commented to theheart.org / Medscape Cardiology: “My hope is that our results will stop the whole population from feeling guilty if they eat fat in moderation. While very high fat intake—when it accounts for 40% or more of your dietary intake—may be bad, the average fat intake is about 30% and that’s okay. We’re all afraid of saturated fat, but actually we shouldn’t be. Saturated fat in moderation actually appears good for you.

“Also, you don’t need to stress out trying to eat five or more portions of fruit and vegetables, when three or four will probably have the same benefits. We’ve had enough evangelism in dietary guidelines. We need more moderation.”

He added: “My advice to the general population to lead a healthy lifestyle is don’t smoke and take exercise—those two things are very clearly beneficial. And then I would say maintain a reasonable weight. You don’t want to be too overweight but you also don’t want to be too skinny. Eat a balanced diet—a bit of meat, fish, several portions of fruit and vegetables, but you don’t have to be vegan or eat an excessive amount of plants to be healthy.

“This is good old-fashioned advice. When I showed these results to my mother, she said, ‘Why did you bother doing this study? This is what our grandmothers and their grandmothers have been advocating for centuries.’ And actually she is right.”

Read more yourself – citations

1:Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study investigators. Associations of fats and carbohydrate intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 18 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2017 Aug 28. pii: S0140-6736(17)32252-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32252-3. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28864332.

2: Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study investigators. Fruit, vegetable, and legume intake, and cardiovascular disease and deaths in 18 countries (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2017 Aug 28. pii: S0140-6736(17)32253-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32253-5. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28864331.

3:Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study investigators. Association of dietary nutrients with blood lipids and blood pressure in 18 countries: a cross-sectional analysis from the PURE study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Oct;5(10):774-787. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30283-8. Epub 2017 Aug 29. PubMed PMID: 28864143.

4: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/884937#vp_1

blog75

Have a Question? Tele-Medicine and Tele-Health may have an answer

By Other TopicsNo Comments

While we are waiting out the Coronavirus, life marches on. You may have a need for a physician to answer questions or take a look at something, whether or not it is related to the virus. You can continue to work with me via Tele-Medicine and Tele-Health. Simply schedule an appointment just like you always would, here https://www.drericaoberg.com/make-an-appointment. Specifics are in the FAQs on this website.

 

There is a lot of misinformation and fear going around. I recommend staying up to date with the facts using the same resource I am using via PubMed, the original resource for medical research and data. You can read the daily updates here. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554776/#article-52171.s6

 
 

For more information on using face masks as a precaution with Coronavirus, please see: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks

 

Please take this time to focus on wellness. Connect with your family and household. Make a phone call to someone who may be isolated. It’s a wonderful opportunity to take care of ourselves with attention to rest and rejuvenation. Get in touch if you’d like to revisit your personalized prevention & self-care program; you can do it without leaving the house!

 

Be Well, Dr. Erica Oberg

blog73

Vaccine Readiness

By Other TopicsNo Comments

As the viral pandemic continues to wreak havoc and disrupt lives and well-being, the news of a promising vaccine seems like a light at the end of the tunnel. Yet, caution with new vaccines is certainly warranted. I’ve always advocated for informed choice in the vaccination space, whether it is for children or adults. I’ve seen a few horrible vaccine reactions, and have seen far more uneventful instances. The worst reaction I’ve treated was a female teen who developed alopecia totalis following an HPV vaccination. She recovered over a two year treatment program, regrew all her hair, and the auto-immune cross-reaction has quieted down. Yet, can you imagine what a devastating few years it was for her – imagine losing all your hair, even eyebrows and lashes, at that delicate time in a young woman’s life! On the other side, I’ve seen more than a few elderly patients suffer months of post-herpetic neuralgia following shingles, which can be largely prevented with a vaccine. If they had been vaccinated, they would not have suffered months of burning and itching pain.

 

Thus, I’m not here to get involved in a debate over whether vaccination is right or wrong, but to educate my patients as information becomes available, and help them optimize their immune system to ensure that if they do choose (or have to) get a vaccine, they are doing everything they can to have a positive response, without adverse effects. Since the vaccine is just starting to be administered in the E.U. and the pilot trials have been relatively small, even the top specialists and scientists won’t have all the answers, and I’m certainly not claiming that here. Here, I share what I know from nutritional biochemistry, the physiology of immune responses, and clinical experiences over the past 20 years. Here, I share what I plan to do to get my immune system ready, since healthcare workers will likely have to step forward to be among the first.

blog74

My first considerations are ensuring all necessary nutrient cofactors are optimized for an adaptive immune response.There are 2 sides of the immune system – the innate and the adaptive. The innate side of the system has gotten a lot of attention lately as it is all about priming the system to respond to a pathogen – vitamin D, zinc, vitamin C, and more are key here. The other side, the adaptive immune system is responsible for activating T cells and B cells starting with the antigen-presentation on the cell surface. This is the immune function we need to focus on to ensure the system responds sufficiently, but not excessively, to a vaccination.

 

The key nutrients critical for the adaptive immune system include vitamins A, D, C, E, B6, B12, Zinc, Iron, Copper, and Selenium.Also important are the nutrient co-factors that are inhibitory, and may prevent overreaction. These include vitamins D, E, and B6 (note these are multi purpose as these nutrients are co-factors in multiple immune mechanisms) thus they are especially important.

 

Next, is the consideration of minimizing the risk of an auto-immune cross-reactivity. This has everything to do with ensuring a healthy microbiome and strong intestinal barrier (i.e. – no leaky gut). Key nutrients for this include vitamin D (yes, again), glutamine, and broad spectrum probiotics. Stress, which pushes us into sympathetic mode, will inhibit healthy parasympathetic activity which includes the vagal nerve messages to keep healthy levels of protective mucin and secretory IgA – keys to a healthy lining and barrier in the gut. Thus, it would be wise to prepare for vaccination with calmness and deep breathing, and certainly do not get vaccinated while in a state of panic (perhaps easier said than done!)

 

Some non-nutrient factors can also be considered pre-vaccination. Exosomes are acellular mRNA packages that send messages to surrounding cells to activate regenerative DNA code, rather than replaying whatever pro-inflammatory cytokine messages that were previously there. While data are preclinical, exosomes trigger IFNγ (interferon gamma) secretion by CD8 T cells, and “probably memory T cells.” Another study found that administration of exosomes along with vaccination “ substantially increases Ag-specific humoral immunity following intramuscular and intranasal vaccination, improving the immunological potency”This holds promise for the role of this therapy for priming a balanced immune response that likely, specifically stimulates the cells that will create the cellular memory for future protection.

 

Finally, just to cover the bases, I’m adding some traditional wisdom to my vaccine preparation plan. Homeopathy, a gentle energy medicine, has traditionally been used to prevent and counteract vaccine reactions in children. Theosinaminum has a long track record of use, if not a lot of clinical research.

 

I’ve put together a few options to help you get ready if you think you’ll be vaccinated over the next 90 days.

1. First, I’ve hand-picked a collection of supplements to meet these goals in FullScript – you can link to it here and order with a 10% discount: https://us.fullscript.com/protocols/droberg-vaccine-preparation

2. I’ve formulated a new vaccine support IV protocol to support your response. It includes a new custom vaccine support micronutrient infusion, followed a week later with 3 units of exosomes. These should be done 1-3 weeks before your vaccination. The protocol package includes a follow up booster infusion, designed to be taken 5-21 days after your vaccination.

3. The plan illustrates the full protocol schedule, including when to start.

 

90 days before:

Start leaky gut protocol, if necessary.

Correct known individual nutrient deficiencies.

Re-focus on anti-stress self-care such as meditation, yoga, time in nature, and better sleep.

 

15-60 days before:

Start oral supplementation protocol, hold off on homeopathic remedy until you know exactly when you’ll be vaccinated

 

1 month before:

Schedule your IV series. 2 preceding vaccination – my new vaccinate support micronutrient infusion and about a week later an infusion of exosomes.

You now have the option of receiving your IV’s at Dr. Oberg’s La Jolla office, or the Tourmaline Collective Birth Center in Pacific Beach, or as a house call (minimum 2 family members – additional charges may apply).

 

2 days before:

Add homeopathic to oral supplement protocol. 3 pellets once per day. Dissolve in a “natural mouth,” meaning away from food or drink or toothpaste by at least 20 minutes.

 

Day of vaccination:

Breathe and think positive thoughts, for yourself and for the generous gift you are giving humanity by becoming part of herd immunity.

 

5-10 days after:

Come in for post-vaccine infusion.

Discontinue homeopathic after 5-10 days, depending on how sensitive you feel you are.

 

For those of you who want to dive into the science, here are 4 excellent articles. Be in touch if you have questions!

 

Be well, Dr O

 
blog72

Breath & Health Connection

By Other TopicsNo Comments

Last month, I hosted a winter webinar virtual retreat on the theme that so many of us focus on at this time – January renewal and re-commitment to a healthier path. This year, I was joined by my practice manager and talented yogi, Jen Snyder. We discussed some factors that I consider key to wellness (see previous post on Happiness), and then Jen lead us in a gentle yoga session. One of the topics we discussed, due to its overlap in wellness and yoga, is breathing.

 

While breathing continues under autonomic control even when we are not thinking about it, there are many benefits to bringing the process into your consciousness and learning to breathe better. Firstly, we should appreciate the importance of the exhale in breathing. Jen points out that in high stress, high anxiety daily activities, we tend to hold our breath, or breathe very shallowly. These are normal fight-or-flight responses, but they become dysfunctional when we are trying to stay grounded and clear. When we exhale, we breathe out carbon dioxide which is acidifying. In fact, panic attacks are exacerbated by hyperventilation and the panic-y feelings are a result of the un-exhaled carbon dioxide which affects the brain. This is why the folk-wisdom of breathing into a paper bag works to calm down a panic attack.

 

Further, when we exhale, we relax the diaphragm muscle, letting it balloon up into the ribcage (see the photo below). Relaxing the diaphragm with full exhalations not only improves your breathing and clarity, it can relax the surrounding muscles improving conditions like low back pain.

 

Did you know? When we lose weight, specifically fat mass, we lose it through our breath? Fat is oxidized into carbon dioxide and water, which must be exhaled. Here’s a nice article if you want to learn more.

 

Does all of this discussion about breathing have you intrigued? Learn more in 2 ways! Join Jen (in person at Buddhi Yoga or online, register for either here) on Sunday, March 7th 2:30-4pm PST for a breathing workshop and practice session. Also, join us in a virtual book club with reading and discussing James Nestor’s new book Breath, which has received a top nonfiction of 2020 award. It’s widely available at your local bookshop, online, or on your digital devices. Comment on the book and discuss with us on Facebook here!